WebBNA v BNB [2024] SGCA 84 3 Background The parties 6 The appellant (“BNA”) is a corporation organised and existing under the laws of the PRC, with its principal place of … WebThe High Court dismissed the jurisdictional challenge, applying, inter alia, the three-stage framework set out in BCY v BCZ [2024] 3 SLR 357 (“BCY”) which was agreed by parties to be the framework when determining the proper law of an arbitration agreement. The High … 13 Mar 2024 - 17 Apr 2024 09:00AM - 06:00PM Hybrid Intake: International … Home; About Us. About SIArb; Current Council; Current Committees; Past … v) ‘Seal’ means the Common Seal of the Institute. vi) ‘Member’ means the … Home; About Us. About SIArb; Current Council; Current Committees; Past …
国际仲裁争议案件评论 ——BNA v BNB [2024] SGHC 142 - 知乎
Web新加坡2024年7月1日公布了一个关于国际仲裁案件的高等法庭判决:BNA v BNB [2024] SGHC 142 (注:由于涉及商业隐私,新加坡法院对当事人做了隐名处理。BNA和BNB均 … http://www.ronaldjjwong.com/2024/10/22/choice-of-law-for-arbitration-agreements/ rancho way petaluma
BNA v BNB AND ANOTHER - i-law
WebThe proceedings were consolidated with another arbitration . BXY v BXX[2024] SGHC(I) 11 3 ... [36] and BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142 at [10] (the latter case having been decided after the hearing of this application). The Issues 19 The issues in the application were: (a) procedurally, whether the application was brought within the 30 WebJun 30, 2024 · In BNA v. BNB, the Korean sellers commenced arbitration against a Chinese buyer for alleged non-payment of amounts due under a contract for the sale of industrial … WebBNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142 SUMMARY In the recent decision in BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142, the Singapore High Court dismissed an application challenging an arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction. The plaintiff argued that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the arbitration agreement was governed by the law of the rancho wayra